P-ISSN 1033-2839
E-ISSN 1839-3713
Vol. 27, Issue 1, 2017January 01, 2017 AEST
Embedding Animal Law into Law School Curricula: The Possibilities of Strategic Unit Design
Embedding Animal Law into Law School Curricula: The Possibilities of Strategic Unit Design
Articles in Vol. 27, Issue 1, 2017
Vol. 27, Issue 1, 2017
- A Compulsory Dispute Resolution Capstone Subject: An Important Inclusion in a 21st Century Australian Law CurriculumRachael M FieldAlpana Roy
- Measuring the Critical Thinking Skills of Law Students Using a Whole-of-Curriculum ApproachNick JamesKelley Burton
- The Student Experience in Second Year Programmes in New Zealand Law SchoolsLynne TaylorErik BrogtUrsula CheerNatalie Baird
- Performance and Pedagogy in the Wild Law Judgment ProjectNicole Rogers
- Editor's Note - Animal Law EducationMeg Good
- Embedding Animal Law into Law School Curricula: The Possibilities of Strategic Unit DesignJoanna Kyriakakis
- Learning by Doing: The Benefits of Experiential Learning in Animals and the LawPeter Sankoff
- Animal Law Syllabus Design: A New Zealand PerspectiveM.B. Rodriguez Ferrere
- What Are We Trying to Achieve by Teaching Animal Law to Law Students?Nick JamesRochelle James
- Digesting Discourse: How Animal Law Facilitates High Quality Legal EducationJackson Walkden-Brown
- A Rationale and Framework for Digital Literacies in Legal EducationKate Galloway
- Student Perspectives on Talking About Sexual Assault in Australian Law ClassesAnna Belgiorno-Nettis
- Blended Learning in the Law Classroom: Design, Implementation and Evaluation of an Intervention in the First Year Curriculum DesignMelissa CastanRoss Hyams
- Active Learning in Law by Flipping the Classroom: An Enquiry into Effectiveness and EngagementKylie BurnsMary KeyesTherese WilsonJoanne Stagg-Taylor
- ForewordKate Galloway
Kyriakakis, Joanna. 2017. “Embedding Animal Law into Law School Curricula: The Possibilities of Strategic Unit Design.” Legal Education Review 27 (1). https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.6092.