P-ISSN 1033-2839
E-ISSN 1839-3713
Vol. 29, Issue 1, 2019March 14, 2019 AEST
Do Law Clinics Need Trigger Warnings? Philosophical, Pedagogical and Practical Concerns
Do Law Clinics Need Trigger Warnings? Philosophical, Pedagogical and Practical Concerns
Articles in Vol. 29, Issue 1, 2019
Vol. 29, Issue 1, 2019
- Alert but not Alarmed: A Response to Parker’s Critique of Wellbeing Scholarship in LawClaire Carroll
- Do Law Clinics Need Trigger Warnings? Philosophical, Pedagogical and Practical ConcernsKate Seear
- How to Encourage Student Voice: Obtaining Effective Feedback from Law Students in Course EvaluationVicci Y.J. Lau
- Developing Students' Sense of Autonomy, Competence and Purpose Through a Clinical Component in Ethics TeachingAnna Cody
- Use of E-exams in High Stakes Law School Examinations: Student and Staff ReactionsAlex SteelLyria Bennett MosesJulian LaurensCharlotte Brady
- Situating Statutory Interpretation in its Public Law ContextJanina BougheyLisa Burton Crawford
- Teaching for the 21st Century: Indigenising the Law Curriculum at UWAAmbelin Kwaymullina
- Motivated to Collaborate: A Self-determination Framework to Improve Group-Based LearningJustine RogersMarina Nehme
- Assessable Moots in Administrative Law: The Role of Student Feedback in Creating CohesionNiamh Kinchin
Seear, Kate. 2019. “Do Law Clinics Need Trigger Warnings? Philosophical, Pedagogical and Practical Concerns.” Legal Education Review 29 (1): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.7671.